multiple variable logistic regression model (Wolters Kluwer Health)
90
Structured Review
Wolters Kluwer Health
multiple variable logistic regression model
Multiple Variable Logistic Regression Model, supplied by Wolters Kluwer Health, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/multiple+variable+logistic+regression+model/multiple+variable+logistic+regression+model/10__1097_slash_bot__0000000000000982-68-2-40
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
Multiple Variable Logistic Regression Model, supplied by Wolters Kluwer Health, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/multiple+variable+logistic+regression+model/multiple+variable+logistic+regression+model/10__1097_slash_bot__0000000000000982-68-2-40
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
multiple variable logistic regression model - by Bioz Stars,
2026-10
90/100 stars
Images
Related Articles
other:Article Title: Risk Factors for Failure of Bone Grafting of Tibia Nonunions and Segmental Bone Defects: A New Preoperative Risk Assessment Score Article Snippet: Results: Multivariate logistic modeling identified 5 significant (P, 0.05) risk factors for failure of the surgery to promote bone healing: (1) mechanism of injury, (2) Increasing body mass index, (3) cortical defect size (mm), (4) flap size (cm2), and (5) insurance status.. A prediction model was created based on these factors and awarded 0 points for fall, 17 points for high energy blunt trauma (OR = 17; 95% CI, 1–286, P = 0.05), 22 points for industrial/other (OR = 22; 95% CI, 1–4, P = 0.04), and 28 points for ballistic injuries (OR = 28; 95% CI, 1–605, P = 0.04).. One point is given for every 10 cm2 of flap size (OR = 1; 95% CI, 1–1.1, P , 0.001), 10 mm of mean cortical gap distance (OR = 1; 95% CI, 1–2, P = 0.004), and 10 units BMI, respectively (OR = 1.5; 95% CI, 1–3, P = 0.16). |